To those

who gave...

Square This!

transparency X vested interest in truth

I'm saying, let's make an issue out of the law being able to be read and by whom.

Erratum

by Jove.
My original intent was a myth take or Comity of Err ors?
From Err at'em to Parse is d'vine.

Comity

network is not a market force?

The Political Coverage? And the hazzards of change and interpreting the progress. Issa that right*?

* Dylan Ratigan stand in(Attorneys General) Toe to Toe [**]

[And The Ed Show: apples and oranges and cherries and pits, sour grapes and aged whine.(Sestak and Lincoln- to link.)

[**]square this: Mukasey's "...least bad case(...)You want to do something, we can find something for you."(with interpreting law and the constitution)[Or no coverage O'Rham a?)

Net Roots or Grass Tip Memo

We are not alone in thinking we have the solutions, but sometimes it takes enough information and expertise to get things done, let alone right. Frustration and fiat are not enough! And often the media serves both rather than fact. In fact, given the relationship between the media and some of the culprits, and an often said reliance on them for information, there is only more information that needs to be filtered or weeded out[**]. This applies to fixing the economic bubble in the stratosphere and the bathyspheric leak* in the our planet. Excuses are lame, but solutions might be unprecedented.
[update: two comments and reining link.]

*only a geographic reference(link) to the President's Press Conference
[**] it took me a while to catch this pun See Update Under Construction.

Con Text

in Context of the last 4 posts.
You are not alone... *[1]
Pre-Press Conference Post[2]
Failure is always(mid press conference comment)[3]
Post Conference Press Comment.[4]
[5-28-10 i.e. We are not alone in thinking... Update.][5]

[It cracked my up that I missed this pun [** "weeded out"]but I must "tend to my garden" or at least my more immediate material world.]

[Update Under Construction]
Friday 10-28-10 links and edit freak out
Please note that I have tried to be consistent and not edited down the road without indicating such. So I should make this log for the record as I can recall it now.

[KEY] [#'s 1 thru 5 #'s added, missing asterisk possibly(yes) in the link, with Bold for emphasis or highlight]
1 two comments and **know better(I-1098) and two labels
2 Matthews untouched
3 referenced in 5 lame?
4 same same? (untuouched, lame)
5 [update, see 1 (two comments), reining (Wall Street), asterisk (*)Press Conference(bathyspheric), bold link of day "fixing the economic bubble", local context (information)I-1098]

I think that should suffice as a roadmap to my own legend. Except for labels and caricatures.

Post Conference Press Comment

"Actions speak louder than words" is a paraphrase or press comment on the press conference* with which I agree.

* Updated Link & Huffington Post.

Failure is always

an ingredient of progress. Perfection is always a failure. (Overwhelming superiority and the best and brightest of intentions* aside.)

* parsing and puns or Pen Dull'em [**]aside there are important dynamics involved

[**] 5-29-10 Err at'm to my original swing

Pre-Press conference Post

Chris Matthews Gushing on the Appearances.
Yesterday, A and B. (Promethean Effort?)

You are not alone...

in not making much economic sense. There are always people who think they know better, it does not mean they have solutions to the problems. There is a case for change, but until there is enough, there are still the same solutions needed*. That is not to say there can't be too much. There can. And Obama isn't it. Too much change that is, but hopefully, incrementally just enough.

We must have a design with an intention, not just a bottom line that starts at the top. Those that see the deficit as the greatest problem and cutting spending as the simplest solution, should know better**, not that it influences their success or advice.

* proper investments(not just jobs) are needed along with top down reform of the "invisible hand" and "bubble" blowing; a tweaking or replacement of Keynesian economics.

** 5-28-10 the other Washington link and labels(I-1098)added.

Heads should roll...

in an administrative and executive sense. This is to light a "Ring of Fire" around the update of my last post, as Robert Kennedy Jr. is now guest on the Thom Hartmann Show. Not to mention a corporate death penalty.

An Outer Truman

His Inner FDR.

The Real Deal?

I've seen it happen time after time. When the Democratic candidate allows himself to be put on the defensive and starts apologizing for the New Deal and the fair Deal, and says he really doesn't believe in them, he is sure to lose. The people don't want a phony Democrat. If it's a choice between a genuine Republican, and a Republican in Democratic clothing, the people will choose the genuine article, every time; that is, they will take a Republican before they will a phony Democrat, and I don't want any phony Democratic candidates in this campaign.

Re: con text
[5-25-10 Say it is so, Joe!]
[And the tale of two leaks? President Obama, Please. Step on some throats! I think the administration should have some "anglers" and "philosphers". This is an obtuse reference to Cheney and Rumsfeld*, but what with the blame that the likes of Palin and Paul place on them, since we don't have "the one" in the White House, we may need a czar of rolling some heads. i.e. "get her done" or out the door types.]
* not in paticular a defense matter, but more on the Secretary of Infotainment front.

Go Left Young Man!

The Pre-Midterm Mandate: The Ed Effect!
Pragmatic Pen Dull Em?
Mass a Choose Its!
Randslide!

Just in! To which I have preemptively addressed in the form of a constitutional "Ctrl F" for "freedom" and "commerce" in that the answer is in the first amendment, if one is not a Utopian reader, it concludes with the freedom..."to petition the Government for a redress of grievances". i.e. Commerce is under the legislative article and "A Republic if you can keep it" and if one can preamble.

[Go West Young Man?]

Slippery Slope

and the Pragmatic Plumber(*), a metarhetorical reply.

(*)not exactly a (cf) or "Ctrl F" but a pun on a part of a navigation tool, the plumb line, not to mention the pendulum C3. Not to Pen Dull Em but thank you Betty** Boop.

** Oops! Becky Boop (under Pragmatic Link)

The Randslide?

I believe I must credit Sarah Palin for using this term. But Rand Paul must credit Rachel Maddow for giving him an even hand.

The Pre-Midterm Mandate: The Ed Effect Sometimes the Democrats ask too little.* I second Ed. And Stephanie Miller. Not to mention TeaParty of the Left?

There is a theory out there that slips my mind now, but if I have not recrafted it, mine is that the Republicans run down government and Democrats have an up hill battle.** Actually I just sharpened it a bit. But economically*** it is a serious theory, if you look at each of the past Democratic Presidents since Eisenhower. Each administration has had a lot to recover from, and have been progressively less timid in addressing the slide, yet increasingly needful of change. Careful change.

* my amendment to Sestak paraphrasing President Kennedy.
** and I don't mean the slippery tubbers(Cf)i.e. link and Ctrl F "tub"
*** Oh and my General(Mills) Eisenhower pun aside,(but not the inversion of the check mark), my theory actually covers the existence of the Democratic Party. I will simply say that since Vietnam there has only been Carter and Clinton while the Carter was not out of the shadow of debt he faced the energy crisis, Clinton failed to transcend the Reagan revolution. I think it hinges on the failure to understand Keynesian economics and the evolution of empires or power period.
[see comments presently three]

The Cantwell Effect

The Filibuster Derivatives Effect?

The Ed Effect!

I just heard Ed Schultz call it, The Pre-Midterm Mandate. He noted that he had mentioned it last night. Not having found it yet, I might add that when you consider the wave, the medium/the mess age, it is a case of divide and cover age. The frustrated are fleeing the muddle. The only call is to challenge the middle.

The Obama Effect?

The Specter Effect!
The Hartmann Effect?
Bottom Line? Not Devolution.

The President is a progressive that needs pushing or convincing while it might be just a hunch that it was more than just self preservation for Specter not to run to the right. I think history should look kindly on Specter to have fought for what he believed rather than go with the flow of Republicans. While Specter was always a crafty navigator of issues, I think that he would rather lose as a moderate than run as a revolutionary.
[This opinion does not rely** on a read of the first two links, while a scroll over of the rest may suffice to get a jist.]

[** nor certainly endorse or bother read]
[Just in! Thom Hartmann predicts Sestak for President in 2016! Not to mention my ironic endorsement of my 2nd link. Ironic in that, how can one believe an NRSC ad? It makes me endorse him, although I am not a Pennsylvanian.]

Many Key an ism?

Deepak Chopra[**]: On Profit Beck* and Duelism.(sp!)

*(sp!) I can't check all puns(or misspells)

[See comment and added footnotes: Manichean ]

[**] Deepak Chopra is in last segment.

Cropping the News?

The Daily Show Lewis Black cedes Beck.
The Colbert Report Colbert routes FOX.
Some weep what they so**.
Sow check* your crop.

*thanks to Casey Kasem
** and some misspell
[updates: 5-17-10 Commity(sp?!), Charlie Rich?, the Free*** Market?, Re;-)sources?(Comity Label added)]

*** non-value or non-prophet